These are the abbreviations we use in the medical device industry for the three steps of process validation: Installation Qualification (IQ), Operational Qualification (OQ), and Performance Qualification (PQ). IQ/OQ/PQ ensures that any equipment you use to manufacture your medical device works the way it should—every single time.
In the medical device industry, even one failure in a manufacturing process can lead to devastating consequences for patients, so let’s dig into IQ, OQ, and PQ and the role each of them plays in validating your company’s manufacturing processes.
In its guidance on process validation , FDA states that process validation is “the collection and evaluation of data, from the process design stage through commercial production, which establishes scientific evidence that a process is capable of consistently delivering quality product.”
To properly complete process validation , manufacturers must carry out and document all three stages of IQ, OQ, and PQ on the equipment they will use to manufacture their devices. The three stages all validate different aspects of the equipment and its associated processes.
It’s important to note that the phases of process validation must occur in this order: IQ, OQ, PQ. Logically, operational qualification cannot happen until the equipment has been installed correctly; nor can performance qualification happen until the equipment is operating.
Installation qualification (IQ) answers the question: “Is everything installed correctly?”
Before you can test whether your equipment performs correctly, you need to know that it has been delivered, installed, and configured correctly. Installation qualification is the documented process that verifies equipment and any parts that comes with it against a checklist of specifications from the manufacturer.
The following steps are often included in IQ:
Operational qualification (OQ) answers the questions: “Is everything operating correctly?” and, “What are the operating limits of this device?”
Once the IQ has been conducted, the next stage in process validation—operational qualification—ensures that the equipment is operating in accordance with the user’s requirements and within the operating range specified by the device manufacturer. In other words, OQ makes sure that the medical device is functioning the way it was designed to.
Operational qualification involves testing all the different functions of the equipment and establishing the operational parameters of the device, which may include:
Performance qualification (PQ) answers the questions: “Does this process produce the right result?” and, “Is this process safe and consistent?”
While similar to operational qualification, performance qualification is used to verify that the equipment consistently produces the correct results under real-world conditions. That means PQ should be conducted in the actual facility with trained personnel, using the utilities, equipment, control procedures and manufacturing process that will be used to produce commercial batches of the product.
FDA recommends creating a written PQ protocol that includes the following items:
Once the protocol has been reviewed and approved, then PQ may begin. Afterward, the manufacturer should prepare a report assessing adherence to the protocol, summarizing the collected data, and addressing any manufacturing nonconformances .
In 21 CFR 820 , FDA also states that IQ, OQ, PQ should occur “where the results of a process cannot be fully verified by subsequent inspection and test.”
In practice, this often includes processes like:
In the case of sterile packaging, for example, verifying the result would require opening it—thereby destroying the packaging and rendering the sterilization process moot.
So, instead of verifying the result, process validation sets out to answer a series of questions that will establish with a high degree of certainty that your process consistently works as it should.
In the past, MedTech companies needed to use IQ, OQ, and PQ to validate software as well as manufacturing processes like the ones we just discussed. But today, software validation is done using a modern, risk-based approach known as computer software assurance (CSA).
At Greenlight Guru, we've adopted an automated, risk-based approach to software validation that's aligned with FDA guidance and best practices of standards like ISO/TR 80002-2:2017 and ISO 13485:2016. Our approach to validation keeps you compliant with regulatory standards and ensures you can implement Greenlight Guru quickly and effectively.
If you’re ready to stop worrying about the validation process and do the work you love, then get your free demo of Greenlight Guru today!
Jesseca Lyons is a Senior Medical Device Guru at Greenlight Guru and a Mechanical Engineer by trade who loves working with cross functional teams, including both engineering and non-engineering disciplines. She’s spent most of her career gathering and defining requirements for new product design and development in the.
