Long-term effects of species loss on community properties across contrasting ecosystems

Biodiversity loss can heavily affect the functioning of ecosystems, and improving our understanding of how ecosystems respond to biodiversity decline is one of the main challenges in ecology 1,2,3,4 . Several important aspects of the longer-term effects of biodiversity loss on ecosystems remain unresolved, including how these effects depend on environmental context 5,6,7 . Here we analyse data from an across-ecosystem biodiversity manipulation experiment that, to our knowledge, represents the world’s longest-running experiment of this type. This experiment has been set up on 30 lake islands in Sweden that vary considerably in productivity and soil fertility owing to differences in fire history 8,9 . We tested the effects of environmental context on how plant species loss affected two fundamental community attributes—plant community biomass and temporal variability—over 20 years. In contrast to findings from artificially assembled communities 10,11,12 , we found that the effects of species loss on community biomass decreased over time; this decrease was strongest on the least productive and least fertile islands. Species loss generally also increased temporal variability, and these effects were greatest on the most productive and most fertile islands. Our findings highlight that the ecosystem-level consequences of biodiversity loss are not constant across ecosystems and that understanding and forecasting these consequences necessitates taking into account the overarching role of environmental context.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

196,21 € per year

only 3,85 € per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

The results of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic

Article 24 August 2020

Species richness is more important for ecosystem functioning than species turnover along an elevational gradient

Article 20 September 2021

Consistent stabilizing effects of plant diversity across spatial scales and climatic gradients

Article 19 September 2022

References

  1. Hector, A. et al. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science286, 1123–1127 (1999). ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  2. Hooper, D. U. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature486, 105–108 (2012). ArticleADSPubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  3. Isbell, F. et al. Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales. Nature546, 65–72 (2017). ArticleADSPubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
  4. Duffy, J. E., Godwin, C. M. & Cardinale, B. J. Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity. Nature549, 261–264 (2017). ArticleADSPubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  5. Craven, D. et al. Plant diversity effects on grassland productivity are robust to both nutrient enrichment and drought. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B371, 20150277 (2016). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Fridley, J. D. Resource availability dominates and alters the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem productivity in experimental plant communities. Oecologia132, 271–277 (2002). ArticleADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gross, K. et al. Species richness and the temporal stability of biomass production: a new analysis of recent biodiversity experiments. Am. Nat.183, 1–12 (2014). ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wardle, D. A., Hörnberg, G., Zackrisson, O., Kalela-Brundin, M. & Coomes, D. A. Long-term effects of wildfire on ecosystem properties across an island area gradient. Science300, 972–975 (2003). ArticleADSPubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  9. Wardle, D. A. & Zackrisson, O. Effects of species and functional group loss on island ecosystem properties. Nature435, 806–810 (2005). ArticleADSPubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  10. Cardinale, B. J. et al. Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104, 18123–18128 (2007). ArticleADSPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Guerrero-Ramírez, N. R. et al. Diversity-dependent temporal divergence of ecosystem functioning in experimental ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol.1, 1639–1642 (2017). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Reich, P. B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss escalate through time as redundancy fades. Science336, 589–592 (2012). ArticleADSPubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  13. Reich, P. B. et al. Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature410, 809–812 (2001). ArticleADSPubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  14. Isbell, F. I., Polley, H. W. & Wilsey, B. J. Biodiversity, productivity and the temporal stability of productivity: patterns and processes. Ecol. Lett.12, 443–451 (2009). ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tilman, D., Reich, P. B. & Knops, J. M. H. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature441, 629–632 (2006). ArticleADSPubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  16. Bezemer, T. M. & van der Putten, W. H. Diversity and stability in plant communities. Nature446, E6–E7 (2007). ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar
  17. Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity simultaneously enhances the production and stability of community biomass, but the effects are independent. Ecology94, 1697–1707 (2013). ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Morin, X., Fahse, L., de Mazancourt, C., Scherer-Lorenzen, M. & Bugmann, H. Temporal stability in forest productivity increases with tree diversity due to asynchrony in species dynamics. Ecol. Lett.17, 1526–1535 (2014). ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. van Ruijven, J. & Berendse, F. Contrasting effects of diversity on the temporal stability of plant populations. Oikos116, 1323–1330 (2007). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. de Mazancourt, C. et al. Predicting ecosystem stability from community composition and biodiversity. Ecol. Lett.16, 617–625 (2013). ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hautier, Y. et al. Eutrophication weakens stabilizing effects of diversity in natural grasslands. Nature508, 521–525 (2014). ArticleADSPubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  22. Wardle, D. A. et al. Linking vegetation change, carbon sequestration and biodiversity: insights from island ecosystems in a long-term natural experiment. J. Ecol.100, 16–30 (2012). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Huston, M. A. & DeAngelis, D. L. Competition and coexistence: the effects of resource transport and supply rates. Am. Nat.144, 954–977 (1994). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Gundale, M. J., Hyodo, F., Nilsson, M. C. & Wardle, D. A. Nitrogen niches revealed through species and functional group removal in a boreal shrub community. Ecology93, 1695–1706 (2012). ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fargione, J. et al. From selection to complementarity: shifts in the causes of biodiversity–productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B274, 871–876 (2007). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Symstad, A. J. & Tilman, D. Diversity loss, recruitment limitation, and ecosystem functioning: lessons learned from a removal experiment. Oikos92, 424–435 (2001). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos91, 3–17 (2000). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Fowler, M. S. et al. Species dynamics alter community diversity–biomass stability relationships. Ecol. Lett.15, 1387–1396 (2012). ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Suding, K. N. et al. Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102, 4387–4392 (2005). ArticleADSPubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
  30. Wardle, D. A., Zackrisson, O., Hörnberg, G. & Gallet, C. The influence of island area on ecosystem properties. Science277, 1296–1299 (1997). ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  31. Wardle, D. A., Walker, L. R. & Bardgett, R. D. Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences. Science305, 509–513 (2004). ArticleADSPubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  32. Clemmensen, K. E. et al. Roots and associated fungi drive long-term carbon sequestration in boreal forest. Science339, 1615–1618 (2013). ArticleADSPubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  33. Díaz, S., Symstad, A. J., Chapin, F. S., Wardle, D. A. & Huenneke, L. F. Functional diversity revealed by removal experiments. Trends Ecol. Evol.18, 140–146 (2003). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Coomes, D. A. & Grubb, P. J. Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecol. Monogr.70, 171–207 (2000). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P. M. & Morin, P. J. Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature390, 162–165 (1997). ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar
  36. Wardle, D. A. & Jonsson, M. Long-term resilience of above- and below ground ecosystem components among contrasting ecosystems. Ecology95, 1836–1849 (2014). ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. .Flower-Ellis, J. G. K. Age Structure and Dynamics in Stands of Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) (Department of Forest Ecology and Forest Soils, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, 1971).
  38. Wardle, D. A. et al. Drivers of inter-year variability of plant production and decomposers across contrasting island ecosystems. Ecology93, 521–531 (2012). ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol.4, 133–142 (2013). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Roscher, C. et al. Overyielding in experimental grassland communities – irrespective of species pool or spatial scale. Ecol. Lett.8, 419–429 (2005). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Loreau, M. & Hector, A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature412, 72–76 (2001). ArticleADSPubMedCASGoogle Scholar
  42. Hector, A. The effect of diversity on productivity: detecting the role of species complementarity. Oikos82, 597–599 (1998). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Loreau, M. Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments. Oikos82, 600–602 (1998). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoaglin, D. C. & Iglewicz, B. Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.82, 1147–1149 (1987). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Lagerström, A., Esberg, C., Wardle, D. A. & Giesler, R. Soil phosphorus and microbial response to a long-term wildfire chronosequence in northern Sweden. Biogeochemistry95, 199–213 (2009). ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

Acknowledgements

We thank numerous assistants for help in the field. This work was supported by grants to D.A.W. from the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet) and a Wallenberg Scholars award.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks Y. Hautier, P. Morin and F. van der Plas for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden Paul Kardol, Nicolas Fanin & David A. Wardle
  2. INRA, UMR 1391 ISPA, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Villenave-d’Ornon, France Nicolas Fanin
  3. Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore David A. Wardle
  1. Paul Kardol